The following is a response to a
friend of mine who asked me to elaborate on my statements concerning a
Christian universe being a better prospect than a Godless one. I hesitated in
posting it here, but at the end of the day I think there are things here that
should be put in the public forum.
“How would respond to an atheist who believes
their life to have more of a point after they gave up belief? Or would you even
respond?”
Well, on the one hand my response
would be tempered by my relationship with the person in question. There are
people I can speak openly with and there are those with whom I must be gentle
because I value their friendship. Not just shutting up to get along but some
worldviews are so alien from one another that they have to treat each other
carefully. Were I to encounter the argument on paper and set about to write a
response, my response would go something like this:
If we
were capable of imagining that we had no preconceived notions of Christ,
humanity, the world, etc. and were given a choice between a universe where we
could live a finite life in as much pleasure as we wish or a universe in which
we had the opportunity for eternal life bathed in truth and love and some
discomfort, I’d imagine most people would choose the latter. The new atheist
has made a similar comparison and concluded otherwise. I believe the reason for
this is that they have compared the ugliest Christianity to the sun shiniest
Atheism. You’ll note sometimes that an atheist will make a case for a specific
Christianity before knocking it down (straw man). I had a friend once that was
a Calvinist street preacher before becoming an atheist. When I expressed an
interest in pursuing God in the most original context possible (Orthodoxy)
before rejecting Him completely, my friend made it his mission to convince me
that Calvin’s Christianity is the only possibly true Christianity. Think about
that for a minute.
The
atheistic universe is one in which the Universe started one day and will
eventually entropy into non-existence. In the intervening time it develops some
interesting things, like humanity, that could be appreciated for a while by
things like humanity and when either disappears there is no longer anything to
appreciate or anything to appreciate it. It’s like the poem Ozymandias, except there won’t even be
anyone to appreciate the irony. It might as well have not existed. I am
reminded of a description of that time in a Doctor Who episode where “the furnaces
were burning and humanity screaming into the night”. Damn God for not existing.
The
Christian universe is one in which the Universe was started and will eventually
be sanctified in a final state of perfection. We were created to crown it and
we are co-working with the Creator to sanctify it. Even at the end of Time we
will continue infinitely into the ever deepening wisdom and love of an infinite
God. In Orthodoxy, we even have the hope that all will eventually be saved,
even if it is an EXTREMELY cautious hope.
This is
nowhere near an argument for the existence of God. It could just be that bad. It
is only a demonstration of how one model is preferable to the other. The new
atheist feels that we are free to work out our morality divorced from that of
our primitive ancestors. The problem is that a morality based in the fickle and
ever changing landscape of popular culture is a morality that is fickle and
ever changing. Right now, those who experience same sex attraction are experiencing
a certain level of social benefit but I would wager money that the tides of
ideologies will change and they will suffer terribly. Remember how the serpent
promised us we would be gods and brought us lower than we began. There is
something to be said for having your stake (cross?) anchored in something
eternal.
There
is only one good reason to believe that an atheistic universe is better than a
Christian one and that is that in an atheistic universe there is no answering
for anything. Choice and Freedom are maximized. They also mean nothing.
No comments:
Post a Comment